Signal of the Day · Regulation & Policy
New bipartisan bill would bar AI from issuing medical-necessity denials — but not in Medicare Advantage or Medicaid
H.R. 10210, the Doctors Not AI Act of 2026, introduced September 1 by Rep. Greg Landsman with three same-day cosponsors, would require that any adverse benefit determination involving clinical judgment not be issued or dictated by an AI system, be made by a licensed professional with training in the service at issue, and not treat AI output as presumptively valid. It adds disclosure duties and an administrative-record duty covering the system used, its role, and any outputs or scores it generated, discoverable by the enrollee on request, and makes AI use in utilization review a treatment limitation for parity purposes. Its definition of a determination involving clinical judgment expressly includes level of care and health care setting — the post-acute fact pattern. But it amends title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act, ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code, and the full bill text contains zero occurrences of Medicare and zero of Medicaid, so the payers behind most skilled-nursing denials fall outside it as drafted.